{"id":16183,"date":"2011-01-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-23T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nuovowww.collaudo.istat.it\/non-categorizzato\/demographic-indicators-jan-dec-2010\/"},"modified":"2024-06-08T21:23:47","modified_gmt":"2024-06-08T19:23:47","slug":"demographic-indicators-jan-dec-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/press-release\/demographic-indicators-jan-dec-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Demographic indicators"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>During the course of 2010, continued population growth was mostly due to the migration balance, which once again was extremely positive while the natural population balance was negative.\u00a0The population showed a further increase of 261,000 units for a rate of 4.3 per thousand inhabitants, summing to a total of 60,601,000 residents as of the end of 2010.<span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif;\"> <\/span>There were fewer deaths and births compared to 2009.<\/p>\n<p>For the forth consecutive year, the natural dynamic (difference between births and deaths) registered a negative balance of -30,200 units. The estimated number of births was 557,000 units, resulting in a birth rate of 9.2 per thousand residents. There were about 12,200 fewer births than in 2009. In 2010, the average number of children per woman (TFR &#8211; total fertility rate) was 1.40, which is just under the 1.41 of 2009.<\/p>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>According to the SDDS programme of the IMF, Istat disseminates an\u00a0annual calendar of press releases both on Istat and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/dsbb.imf.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SDDS<\/a> website.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During the course of 2010, continued population growth was mostly due to the migration balance, which once again was extremely positive while the natural population [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4082],"tags":[3409,3530,3203,3222,3579,3237,3177,3114,3171,2969],"regione":[],"tema":[4040],"class_list":["post-16183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-release","tag-residence-changes","tag-demographic-indicators","tag-demography","tag-fertility","tag-foreign-persons","tag-foreigners","tag-municipalities","tag-population-register","tag-resident-population","tag-report","tema-population-and-households"],"meta_fields":{"data_pubblicazione":"20110124","descrizioneperiodo":"Year 2010","titolobreve":"Demographic indicators","news":"In 2010 the population showed a further increase of 261,000 units for a rate of 4.3 per thousand inhabitants, summing to a total of 60,601,000 residents as of the end of 2010","news_rss":"uring the course of 2010, continued population growth was mostly due to the migration balance, which once again was extremely positive while the natural population balance was negative. There were fewer deaths and births compared to 2009.\nFor the forth consecutive year, the natural dynamic (difference between births and deaths) registered a negative balance of -30,200 units. The estimated number of births was 557,000 units, resulting in a birth rate of 9.2 per thousand residents. There were about 12,200 fewer births than in 2009. In 2010, the average number of children per woman (TFR - total fertility rate) was 1.40, which is just under the 1.41 of 2009.","sottotitolo":""},"acf":[],"wpml_current_locale":"en_US","wpml_translations":[],"tags-info":[{"id":3409,"label":"changes of residence","slug":"residence-changes"},{"id":3530,"label":"demographic indicators","slug":"demographic-indicators"},{"id":3203,"label":"demography","slug":"demography"},{"id":3222,"label":"fertility","slug":"fertility"},{"id":3579,"label":"foreign persons","slug":"foreign-persons"},{"id":3237,"label":"foreigners","slug":"foreigners"},{"id":3177,"label":"municipalities","slug":"municipalities"},{"id":3114,"label":"population register","slug":"population-register"},{"id":3171,"label":"resident population","slug":"resident-population"},{"id":2969,"label":"statistics report","slug":"report"}],"categories-info":[{"id":4082,"label":"Press release","slug":"press-release"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16183\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16183"},{"taxonomy":"regione","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regione?post=16183"},{"taxonomy":"tema","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.istat.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tema?post=16183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}